USA Funhouse album qualitive 17 Again hit awesome track Obsessed (Official Remix) USA Monsters vs Aliens video nice mp3 It's Not Me, It's You cool video (500) Days of Summer CD Pixie Lott hit CD Lies & Illusions video best Lily Allen mp3 cool hot No Country for Old Men

English flag Arabic flag Bulgarian flag Chinese (Simplified) flag Chinese (Traditional) flag Croatian flag Czech flag Danish flag Dutch flag Finnish flag French flag German flag Greek flag Hindi flag Italian flag Japanese flag Korean flag Norwegian flag Polish flag Portuguese flag Romanian flag Russian flag Spanish flag Swedish flag
When to consider using HiTUS PDF Print E-mail
  • I need to deposit thin film that I cannot deposit with magnetron
  • I need to get higher uniformity than magnetron.  (Depends on substrate rotation etc)
  • I need to deposit faster than magnetron included for reactive deposition and ferromagnetic materials
  • I need higher target utilisation rate
  • I need higher process quality process
  • I need better adhesion onto the substrate
  • I need to better reactive sputtering
  • I need better reproducibility and this without feedback control/thin film deposition monitoring
  • I need better stability during all the process deposition
  • I need to conduct researches/experiments that I cannot do with magnetron
  • I need very high uniformity up to 35cm wide substrate OK with linear technology
  • I need very high uniformity in strip coating
  • I need very low poisoning
  • I need to deposit magnetic material using thick target
  • I need to deposit dielectrics faster than magnetron
  • I need thin film properties very near the bulk’s target material
  • I need to control the stress/strain
  • I need to deposit at low temperature
  • If a multilayer structure is to be deposited, then it is very likely that the HiTUS technology will be less costly than if using a magnetron system.  This cost effective solution is possible because PQL’s unique process can incorporate a target holder with up to six (6) targets whilst only requiring ONE target bias power supply, whereas a magnetron requires a power supply for EACH target (the availability of reliable high power switching devices for alternating  between targets precludes the single power supply option).  Additionally with the magnetron configuration each target also requires its own magnet set, with the associated incremental costs.